Link: http://us.movember.com/


Link: http://amyjoydonuts.tumblr.com/post/7272826232


Link: http://today.msnbc.msn.com/id/41632581/ns/today-entertainment/
I just read an article on How the Kardashians made $65M last year. I know, I know, as if there needs to be an article written and as if I need to admit reading it..*cough* allthewaythrough *cough*. But, there is something about articles like this. People who are famous for seemingly looking like they do a lot in the media because of the coverage. But when broken down, its all face value, literally.In my opinion, the merit given to any of what they got paid for only reinforces my belief that beauty and brains are,more often than not, rivals. Society loves a pretty face. And don't get me wrong, I can enjoy beauty just like anyone. The Kardashian girls are beautiful. No question. What bothers me is we live in a society where those who educate future generations make about 4% per year of what the Kardashians made from selling their face and name over a show about nothing. There isnt a balance of wealth for for those who are truly in the trenches everyday trying to make the world a better place.
But they give back you say? They join in on the various celebrity stands such as "I will not tweet until this charity makes X amount of money" pretentious BS. Can you just imagine if your local school down the street said they wouldn't tweet until they got a raise? Theirs no uprising, no funds being allocated, no big media blitzkrieg. Those local educators do a strike and then they are replaced if they don't give in and that's that. The gratification of a few more children who graduate because of a teacher that saved them from failing is far less than seeing the new Kim Kardashian super bowl ad for shoes and a shot of an over-exposed backside. Our values are skewed by pretty opportunists.
Weak needs that falter to batting eyelashes.
Article: How the Kardashians made $65M Last Year



|
The reporter guy's intro is kinda funny to me... "yeah live at the SCENE OF THE CRIME" all sarcastic like he has some better news to cover.
|
|
wait for it... wait for it.... |

A Shorter Route To Communication by Mark Allen
I heard this little clip on NPR while driving home tonight and it made me chuckle. Technology has invaded our attention spans in ways we don't even realize yet.
read a little below or listen to the whole clip above....
All Things Considered, July 8, 2009· Best line of the year for me? Shorter. I sent an e-mail that was four sentences long to one of my bosses, and he sent a one-word reply back from his Blackberry: Shorter—one time he jokingly mentioned that I sent long-winded e-mails (I do, sometimes). This e-mail I sent was just quick, information, work-related...and I needed answers.
At first I thought it was a weird typo, but indeed it was him, telling me to make my e-mail to him shorter. Basically re-type it, shorter, and submit it again for his "is-it-short-enough" approval. And his e-mail was an example for me on how to do that. Because he's savvier than me, that's why. Not even a period, just "Shorter". Even the "Sent from my Verizon Wireless BlackBerry" at the bottom was longer. I didn't even respond. It's probably because he's very into the one-sentence blogging social network sites like Facebook and Twitter, which he still uses constantly (but if you ask him, he'll tell you he's "over" them).
Anyway, it's now my new favorite response to anyone, at anytime, for anything. I've been saying it to my boyfriend all day. I just say "shorter" and walk away. Next time someone you don't like hassles you about something and uses more than two syllables to do it, just calmly say "shorter" and walk out of the room. Try it! It's brilliant!
Swine Flu
Scared yet?
|
|
|
![]()
|
|
"The fact of evolution is the backbone of biology, and biology is thus in the peculiar position of being a science founded on an improved theory, is it then a science or faith?"
|
Kidding aside though,I've gone through a few points in my head about this and the first one that goes without saying is WTF?! (but I said it didn't I?) I was reading how the parent group, parents television council , said this song was definitely not about a girl named Amy. Also that parents need to be aware of this recording. Seriously, I can think of a half dozen other songs to be concerned with and even at that, its music for god sake. Whatever happened to expressing yourself freely? Whatever happened to turning the dial or not buying something you think is personally offensive? Parent groups have their purpose but in all honesty, they probably just incited about 1 million more curious minds to go buy the album or song from itunes just to hear the f word spelled out. I can't lie and say I am a huge Britney fan because I'm not but I think as an artist or entertainer (whatever you think she is), isn't the F word the least of our worries about her? If we think about her at all? I read a Fox article that was concerned not only about the F word being spelled out but also that the "B" word was being used on a song too. Meanwhile Christina Aguilera has a song called "Keeps Getting Better" that is in a Target ad where the lyrics say "sometimes I'm a super bitch". Of course the bitch part is muted but there is nothing said about this. No controversy. It's all a game of who the media feels is an easy target or full throttle into another publicity stunt.
|
:: Next >>